In his one remaining appeal, Spencer claimed that the trial court abused its discretion because the Township did not offer adequate evidence to support the fine, the trial court committed an error of law when it determined that the Township’s Zoning Ordinance did not require a business use for a property to be a “junkyard,” and the trial court erred in dismissing the selective enforcement challenge. 705-2019 through 709-2019, the court quashed those appeals.
Since Spencer failed to file a notice of appeal from the other trial court orders for Case Nos. The court noted there was no consolidation of those case and, absent this, Spencer’s singular appeal was not proper according to Walker and its interpretation of the Note to Rule 341(a) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure. 704-2019) from the trial court’s order, which levied fines for the six properties at six separate docket numbers. Here, Spencer filed one notice of appeal (Docket No. Spencer, junkyard owner, appealed from an Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Venango County, which imposed fines for six different properties owned by Spencer at six separate docket numbers pursuant to complaints filed by the Township of Cranberry based on Spencer operating a junkyard in violation of Township ordinances. This post was authored by Matthew Loescher, Esq.
0 kommentar(er)
